In a recent post, the bad cat did a follow up on birth data in Sweden which shows a significantly lower number of births in 2022 vs. 2021. He instructs us to be cautious on drawing strong conclusions as the data available to us is not nearly enough to provide certainty of a fertility effect from the vaccination campaign.
Every piece of actual data seems to be against them, therefore they're frantically trying to bury all the data. Even so, we have awesome people like you who are willing to dig it out! Well done!!!
I also wrote several articles on UK and birth rates, but did not come up with your great idea to look at births by deprivation. You just about nailed the cause!
This is a GREAT FIND!!!
Unfortunately the difference between least deprived, and most deprived vax rates is not as huge, it is very significant.
this is a very interesting analysis and the inflections on the birth %'s by deprivation quintiles would seem to point to this effect commencing with pregnancies that began in jan-mar 2021 which aligns with strong precision to the period in which covid vaccines were rolling out.
we're still playing a mosaic style game here, but there sure are A LOT of tiles whose color looks worrying...
with your permission, would like to include one of these charts in the sweden update for the aug data that just hit.
Thank you for a great additional piece of evidence! I respect you're wanting to be cautious in attribution to the jabs, which is appropriate in your position as legitimate analyst.
I, however, have no such position so at this point I consider the burden of proof to be on the narrative keepers, to prove to us every additional data point that points to jab toxicity isn't really jab toxicity. Because I am assuming any strange negative medical data to be jab related unless proven otherwise. There is a hell of a lot of it in 2021/22!
I arrived here from Igor's post. Thanks for this and your other insights - subscribed! Also thanks Igor for your recent post working with this idea too - looks bad for those of us in the UK!
How reliable is the UKHSA data though? It is totally different to the NHS data which again is unreliable. I've been trying to get hold of the actual definitive stats from the NHS but all of their data is half missing. Any ideas?
You also need to track the number of marriages. The number of marriages has been falling. Declining rates of marriage will result in declining number of births.
You absolutely need to read (and get in touch with the authors of) the report made by the "Initiative Corona" team, led by Austrian Dr. Christian Fiala, which has found impressive correlations in most of EU-27 countries (& others) where data was available.
The German and Swiss birth rates show an impressive 10% drop just 9 months after the peak of the vaccination campaigns. This is the beginning of a depopulation scandal, here's the link:
So the well-off chattering classes who hid in their home office whilst their Waitrose deliveries were made and their handmade masks from Etsy were delivered, the ones who enjoyed believing it was a good old plague which required them to avoid all strangers, wear masks on solitary dog walks and take as many jabs as possible are now discovering they are failing to get pregnant?
Whereas the people who facilitated this comfy lifestyle by carrying on working saw that the whole thing was a scam, seeing as how they didn't drop down dead from a cold, so didn't bother taking an injection with no safety data and are now happily getting pregnant?
So this got me interested when @Jikkyleaks highlighted this trend, so it was great to get an analysis, thanks. It prompted me to look at Australian births data but the ABS is always so out of date with their reporting. Luckily Victoria has reported its births up to November 2022. Well even allowing for a 4 month later than UK in vax delivery, there is no apparent fall in births. April through to November is higher or similar to the 2021 month. Your trend may be due to other factors or maybe more use of Astra than Australia or maybe economic stress?? dunno but if its causal with vaccination I would expect a similar relationship to be present across many countries.
What about the nations who used mRNA "vaccines" the LEAST? Should those nations show about the same amount of births before and after the bioweapon?
Yes, I don't think all the horrible effects are due to chance, or "accidental"
When something consistently points only in one direction it screams "deliberate' to me.
The "die is cast". We will have to see if there's ultimately accountability. I don't have high hopes, Fauci is still walking around free. Yes, I believe in "due process" but in any society that values truth, somebody like Fauci would be holed up in a "undisclosed location" and we would only be hearing from his lying ("our client looks forward to proving his innocence in a court of law") lawyers.
The scope of the damage from the "vaccines" ALONE hasn't even been plausibly estimated yet, MSM and government (but I repeat) has successfully distracted from all the people dropping dead, and the phrase "doctors baffled" is still being used without irony.
As long as Fauci is walking free without indictment and criminal conspiracy accusations we know their cover-up is working.
If you think I exaggerate regarding Fauci's legal "exposure" then you haven't read "the REAL Anthony Fauci" by RFK Jr. No matter which political party you belong to (or if you aren't "political" at all) you need to read it and realize the evil that Anthony Fauci is and represents, and recent news show that he hands out over 40 billion a year for "research" (scrupulously avoiding significant COVID and COVID "vaccine" research) and a significant amount is being spent on bioweapon research in many countries, this avoiding (legally or illegally?) Obama's EO or directive that gain-of-function research be "paused". Recently they unvieled a man made variant of COVID which combined the Omricon "spike" (much more contagious than original COVID) with the base of the first COVID virus to increase lethality to 80 percent case fatality rate. An that's just what is public. They are very interested in the various hemorrhagic fevers like ebola, Marlburg (sp) and the like.
What about the nations who used mRNA "vaccines" the LEAST? Should those nations show about the same amount of births before and after the bioweapon?
Yes, I don't think all the horrible effects are due to chance, or "accidental"
When something consistently points only in one direction it screams "deliberate' to me.
The "die is cast". We will have to see if there's ultimately accountability. I don't have high hopes, Fauci is still walking around free. Yes, I believe in "due process" but in any society that values truth, somebody like Fauci would be holed up in a "undisclosed location" and we would only be hearing from his lying ("our client looks forward to proving his innocence in a court of law") lawyers.
The scope of the damage from the "vaccines" ALONE hasn't even been plausibly estimated yet, MSM and government (but I repeat) has successfully distracted from all the people dropping dead, and the phrase "doctors baffled" is still being used without irony.
As long as Fauci is walking free without indictment and criminal conspiracy accusations we know their cover-up is working.
If you think I exaggerate regarding Fauci's legal "exposure" then you haven't read "the REAL Anthony Fauci" by RFK Jr. No matter which political party you belong to (or if you aren't "political" at all) you need to read it and realize the evil that Anthony Fauci is and represents, and recent news show that he hands out over 40 billion a year for "research" (scrupulously avoiding significant COVID and COVID "vaccine" research) and a significant amount is being spent on bioweapon research in many countries, this avoiding (legally or illegally?) Obama's EO or directive that gain-of-function research be "paused". Recently they unvieled a man made variant of COVID which combined the Omricon "spike" (much more contagious than original COVID) with the base of the first COVID virus to increase lethality to 80 percent case fatality rate. An that's just what is public. They are very interested in the various hemorrhagic fevers like ebola, Marlburg (sp) and the like.
Every piece of actual data seems to be against them, therefore they're frantically trying to bury all the data. Even so, we have awesome people like you who are willing to dig it out! Well done!!!
Every where I look, when it comes to Covid, "more analysis is needed". Which is sorta what you want our public health institutions to do.
I've never seen the wholesale level of reputation destruction as our PH infrastructure in the past 3 years.
Hi.
I also wrote several articles on UK and birth rates, but did not come up with your great idea to look at births by deprivation. You just about nailed the cause!
This is a GREAT FIND!!!
Unfortunately the difference between least deprived, and most deprived vax rates is not as huge, it is very significant.
this is a very interesting analysis and the inflections on the birth %'s by deprivation quintiles would seem to point to this effect commencing with pregnancies that began in jan-mar 2021 which aligns with strong precision to the period in which covid vaccines were rolling out.
we're still playing a mosaic style game here, but there sure are A LOT of tiles whose color looks worrying...
with your permission, would like to include one of these charts in the sweden update for the aug data that just hit.
Thank you for a great additional piece of evidence! I respect you're wanting to be cautious in attribution to the jabs, which is appropriate in your position as legitimate analyst.
I, however, have no such position so at this point I consider the burden of proof to be on the narrative keepers, to prove to us every additional data point that points to jab toxicity isn't really jab toxicity. Because I am assuming any strange negative medical data to be jab related unless proven otherwise. There is a hell of a lot of it in 2021/22!
I arrived here from Igor's post. Thanks for this and your other insights - subscribed! Also thanks Igor for your recent post working with this idea too - looks bad for those of us in the UK!
Do the South Africans produce this kind of data? Low vaccination rate and publishes in English so perhaps worth a comparison.
How reliable is the UKHSA data though? It is totally different to the NHS data which again is unreliable. I've been trying to get hold of the actual definitive stats from the NHS but all of their data is half missing. Any ideas?
You also need to track the number of marriages. The number of marriages has been falling. Declining rates of marriage will result in declining number of births.
You absolutely need to read (and get in touch with the authors of) the report made by the "Initiative Corona" team, led by Austrian Dr. Christian Fiala, which has found impressive correlations in most of EU-27 countries (& others) where data was available.
The German and Swiss birth rates show an impressive 10% drop just 9 months after the peak of the vaccination campaigns. This is the beginning of a depopulation scandal, here's the link:
https://initiative-corona.info/fileadmin/dokumente/Geburtenrueckgang-Europe-EN.pdf
So the well-off chattering classes who hid in their home office whilst their Waitrose deliveries were made and their handmade masks from Etsy were delivered, the ones who enjoyed believing it was a good old plague which required them to avoid all strangers, wear masks on solitary dog walks and take as many jabs as possible are now discovering they are failing to get pregnant?
Whereas the people who facilitated this comfy lifestyle by carrying on working saw that the whole thing was a scam, seeing as how they didn't drop down dead from a cold, so didn't bother taking an injection with no safety data and are now happily getting pregnant?
Serendipity?
Karma?
What's the word I'm looking for?
Recessions cause lower birth rates. In the United States during the 2008 recession birth rates declined 9%.
wait a minute.
it could be that the number of women in the two groups that are least deprived has gone down significantly...
So this got me interested when @Jikkyleaks highlighted this trend, so it was great to get an analysis, thanks. It prompted me to look at Australian births data but the ABS is always so out of date with their reporting. Luckily Victoria has reported its births up to November 2022. Well even allowing for a 4 month later than UK in vax delivery, there is no apparent fall in births. April through to November is higher or similar to the 2021 month. Your trend may be due to other factors or maybe more use of Astra than Australia or maybe economic stress?? dunno but if its causal with vaccination I would expect a similar relationship to be present across many countries.
What about the nations who used mRNA "vaccines" the LEAST? Should those nations show about the same amount of births before and after the bioweapon?
Yes, I don't think all the horrible effects are due to chance, or "accidental"
When something consistently points only in one direction it screams "deliberate' to me.
The "die is cast". We will have to see if there's ultimately accountability. I don't have high hopes, Fauci is still walking around free. Yes, I believe in "due process" but in any society that values truth, somebody like Fauci would be holed up in a "undisclosed location" and we would only be hearing from his lying ("our client looks forward to proving his innocence in a court of law") lawyers.
The scope of the damage from the "vaccines" ALONE hasn't even been plausibly estimated yet, MSM and government (but I repeat) has successfully distracted from all the people dropping dead, and the phrase "doctors baffled" is still being used without irony.
As long as Fauci is walking free without indictment and criminal conspiracy accusations we know their cover-up is working.
If you think I exaggerate regarding Fauci's legal "exposure" then you haven't read "the REAL Anthony Fauci" by RFK Jr. No matter which political party you belong to (or if you aren't "political" at all) you need to read it and realize the evil that Anthony Fauci is and represents, and recent news show that he hands out over 40 billion a year for "research" (scrupulously avoiding significant COVID and COVID "vaccine" research) and a significant amount is being spent on bioweapon research in many countries, this avoiding (legally or illegally?) Obama's EO or directive that gain-of-function research be "paused". Recently they unvieled a man made variant of COVID which combined the Omricon "spike" (much more contagious than original COVID) with the base of the first COVID virus to increase lethality to 80 percent case fatality rate. An that's just what is public. They are very interested in the various hemorrhagic fevers like ebola, Marlburg (sp) and the like.
What about the nations who used mRNA "vaccines" the LEAST? Should those nations show about the same amount of births before and after the bioweapon?
Yes, I don't think all the horrible effects are due to chance, or "accidental"
When something consistently points only in one direction it screams "deliberate' to me.
The "die is cast". We will have to see if there's ultimately accountability. I don't have high hopes, Fauci is still walking around free. Yes, I believe in "due process" but in any society that values truth, somebody like Fauci would be holed up in a "undisclosed location" and we would only be hearing from his lying ("our client looks forward to proving his innocence in a court of law") lawyers.
The scope of the damage from the "vaccines" ALONE hasn't even been plausibly estimated yet, MSM and government (but I repeat) has successfully distracted from all the people dropping dead, and the phrase "doctors baffled" is still being used without irony.
As long as Fauci is walking free without indictment and criminal conspiracy accusations we know their cover-up is working.
If you think I exaggerate regarding Fauci's legal "exposure" then you haven't read "the REAL Anthony Fauci" by RFK Jr. No matter which political party you belong to (or if you aren't "political" at all) you need to read it and realize the evil that Anthony Fauci is and represents, and recent news show that he hands out over 40 billion a year for "research" (scrupulously avoiding significant COVID and COVID "vaccine" research) and a significant amount is being spent on bioweapon research in many countries, this avoiding (legally or illegally?) Obama's EO or directive that gain-of-function research be "paused". Recently they unvieled a man made variant of COVID which combined the Omricon "spike" (much more contagious than original COVID) with the base of the first COVID virus to increase lethality to 80 percent case fatality rate. An that's just what is public. They are very interested in the various hemorrhagic fevers like ebola, Marlburg (sp) and the like.