It is not lost on me that the folks that write with perhaps a contrarian view on COVID related data coincidentally often have contrarian views on climate change topics.
So basically, were coming out of a mini ice age and the temp is has raised by 1 degree since mini ice age. And we know this because they take temperatures in heavily heat absorbant exothermic areas such as cities and airports. Hmmm all sounds legit to me, someone pass me a CBDC and a carbon credited social credit score.
Very nice. I've seen similar charts with ice extent/volume - it's all in the presentation.
What they also leave out is that the earth has been warming since coming out of the little ice age in the mid1850s. The default position is that the earth should be warming a little bit every year to continue that trend. It's expected that every year is the hottest on record! Unless they can explain what caused the little ice age and why temperature shouldn't naturally be continuing to increase mildly each year, it's hard to take them seriously.
I’ve been following this climate hoax agenda since well before covid (in fact, being alert to the fraud behind this man-made global warming scam helped me to recognize the covid propaganda early on).
I first read John Casey’s excellent book “Dark Winter” years ago, around 2015. It was fascinating to me (highly recommend) and this subject continues to intrigue me. I follow Cap Allon on electroverse.co who posts new articles each morning documenting the record-breaking cold, snow, etc we’ve seen globally in recent years that are completely ignored by the heat-chasing MSM. Far from there being a “consensus” and “settled science” on this topic, many many reputable, respected and brilliant scientists have been trying to get the truth out on this for years. But just as we’ve seen with covid, those voices and individuals trying to speak truth against the agenda are systematically canceled, vilified, erased. I’m really hoping the growing awareness of all the covid propaganda of the last few years and resulting devastation will finally jolt people awake to this hoax as well!
Hysterical projections for the end of this century calculate a degree or two increase in average temperatures. They then assume this will kill ocean life, or expand the seas, or cause extensive droughts, or floods, or warmer summers or colder winters... meaning there is no consensus, because they really don't know. The proposed solutions are to make extremely expensive infrastructure changes not supportable with current rechnologies, just in case. But their forecasts with decimated populations show fractions of degrees changes per century. Irrelevant.
This is clearly a scam, tolerable only by people too ignorant to recognize the fraud and too frightened and dependent to question it. Working to clarify the data is a fine hobby, but unlikely to be effective in convincing either the fraudsters, whose objectives are accumulating power for their "side," or their mindless disciples, who fear ever losing the nurturing comfort their cult. Only force will deter them. Restoring rational political control will work. Litigation to prevent fraudulent claims might work (ask Mark Steyn how well that works). Reforming the failed education system would work, eventually, in a couple of generations. But the most likely solutions will be more physical. They achieved this level of insanity by yelling and breaking things. Similar counteractions will be necessary to reverse it. Shutting off the power might be what it takes to motivate enough people to start getting rowdy.
We certainly can't survive most of the Kelvin scale, so changes scaled within a habitable range are adequate. The real problem is limiting that range to just the average for early summer. We're much more adaptable than that. But we know it's a scam when they try to call a trend from a few decades of records. The earth is much more dynamic than that, always has been, will continue to be.
I've read things about adjustments and so forth but have never dove into the details. The folks that work in this field have managed to create a wall of complexity around it that makes it hard to analyze the data. What I'm trying to show here is that even if you accept their data at face value, the presentation makes a big difference.
Tony Heller has the changes documented, I believe. If someone out there could be of service on this issue, help that man clean up his webpage. It's very difficult to read, so it makes me think he's obfuscating.
I have a hard time with Tony Heller’s site too, I find myself optimistically going there from time to time but usually come away frustrated without rlly learning anything. I get a lot more useful info from Cap Allon at electroverse.co I check his site for new articles each morning and often refer back to his older ones as well which are often excellent.
No, I follow more of the medical side of this multifaceted assault on freedom and sanity. But 30+ years ago I took a class at Pasadena City College with a (retired physicist from Cal Tech??) professor I believe was named Zink who debunked "global warming" in short order. So I peek into this theatre of the war every once in awhile. I mentioned Zink just in case anyone else out there knows who I'm talking about. I didn't realize how important that one class was going to be until 20 years later and didn't keep my notes!
GISS is publishing yearly global avg. temperature in Vital Signa starting from 1950. Surprisingly, from 1998 they decreased the temperature for every prior year by exactly 1 degree.
Yes I’ve seen many references to this as well as other “corrections” made to the “official” record, such as completely erasing the medieval warming period so as to make the most recent warming period (from roughly 1980-2000ish) look unprecedented and alarming. It was neither of those things, it was merely part of the natural, cyclical pattern of warming and cooling periods that have always existed on earth. (Just prior to this latest warming period, for example, the fear mongering was all about a “cooling” climate and imminent “little ice age”. Hard to believe, but there were alarming, attention-grabbing newspaper articles making this prediction as recently as the 60s and 70s).
Warming periods are always followed by cooling periods and vice versa...it’s a balancing act that the earth has down pat and has always managed without any help from us. By many accounts, we actually ended the most recent warming period several years ago (anywhere from late 90s to late 2000s...?) and have been consistently cooling ever since. For excellent tracking of the record breaking cold temps/snow/ice events that you will never hear about from the heat seeking MSM, I recommend electroverse.co. He has an impressive archive - excellent articles going back years. I also highly recommend John Casey’s “Dark Winter” which was published in 2014. It’s a fascinating topic!
So basically, were coming out of a mini ice age and the temp is has raised by 1 degree since mini ice age. And we know this because they take temperatures in heavily heat absorbant exothermic areas such as cities and airports. Hmmm all sounds legit to me, someone pass me a CBDC and a carbon credited social credit score.
Yes, I think we need to educate ourselves about how all these magic tricks are done, so we won't be fooled again!
I have built upon your work and re-analyzed the data a little bit differently from the perspective of gee-whiz chart - http://alandharma.net/joomla/index.php/en/alan
weaponized chartjunk
Very nice. I've seen similar charts with ice extent/volume - it's all in the presentation.
What they also leave out is that the earth has been warming since coming out of the little ice age in the mid1850s. The default position is that the earth should be warming a little bit every year to continue that trend. It's expected that every year is the hottest on record! Unless they can explain what caused the little ice age and why temperature shouldn't naturally be continuing to increase mildly each year, it's hard to take them seriously.
The science no longer matters. The climate change promoters have a political agenda.
I vote for chart 2
Enjoy the interglacial
I’ve been following this climate hoax agenda since well before covid (in fact, being alert to the fraud behind this man-made global warming scam helped me to recognize the covid propaganda early on).
I first read John Casey’s excellent book “Dark Winter” years ago, around 2015. It was fascinating to me (highly recommend) and this subject continues to intrigue me. I follow Cap Allon on electroverse.co who posts new articles each morning documenting the record-breaking cold, snow, etc we’ve seen globally in recent years that are completely ignored by the heat-chasing MSM. Far from there being a “consensus” and “settled science” on this topic, many many reputable, respected and brilliant scientists have been trying to get the truth out on this for years. But just as we’ve seen with covid, those voices and individuals trying to speak truth against the agenda are systematically canceled, vilified, erased. I’m really hoping the growing awareness of all the covid propaganda of the last few years and resulting devastation will finally jolt people awake to this hoax as well!
The important question is, "So what?"
Hysterical projections for the end of this century calculate a degree or two increase in average temperatures. They then assume this will kill ocean life, or expand the seas, or cause extensive droughts, or floods, or warmer summers or colder winters... meaning there is no consensus, because they really don't know. The proposed solutions are to make extremely expensive infrastructure changes not supportable with current rechnologies, just in case. But their forecasts with decimated populations show fractions of degrees changes per century. Irrelevant.
This is clearly a scam, tolerable only by people too ignorant to recognize the fraud and too frightened and dependent to question it. Working to clarify the data is a fine hobby, but unlikely to be effective in convincing either the fraudsters, whose objectives are accumulating power for their "side," or their mindless disciples, who fear ever losing the nurturing comfort their cult. Only force will deter them. Restoring rational political control will work. Litigation to prevent fraudulent claims might work (ask Mark Steyn how well that works). Reforming the failed education system would work, eventually, in a couple of generations. But the most likely solutions will be more physical. They achieved this level of insanity by yelling and breaking things. Similar counteractions will be necessary to reverse it. Shutting off the power might be what it takes to motivate enough people to start getting rowdy.
We certainly can't survive most of the Kelvin scale, so changes scaled within a habitable range are adequate. The real problem is limiting that range to just the average for early summer. We're much more adaptable than that. But we know it's a scam when they try to call a trend from a few decades of records. The earth is much more dynamic than that, always has been, will continue to be.
I've read things about adjustments and so forth but have never dove into the details. The folks that work in this field have managed to create a wall of complexity around it that makes it hard to analyze the data. What I'm trying to show here is that even if you accept their data at face value, the presentation makes a big difference.
Tony Heller has the changes documented, I believe. If someone out there could be of service on this issue, help that man clean up his webpage. It's very difficult to read, so it makes me think he's obfuscating.
I have a hard time with Tony Heller’s site too, I find myself optimistically going there from time to time but usually come away frustrated without rlly learning anything. I get a lot more useful info from Cap Allon at electroverse.co I check his site for new articles each morning and often refer back to his older ones as well which are often excellent.
No, I follow more of the medical side of this multifaceted assault on freedom and sanity. But 30+ years ago I took a class at Pasadena City College with a (retired physicist from Cal Tech??) professor I believe was named Zink who debunked "global warming" in short order. So I peek into this theatre of the war every once in awhile. I mentioned Zink just in case anyone else out there knows who I'm talking about. I didn't realize how important that one class was going to be until 20 years later and didn't keep my notes!
GISS is publishing yearly global avg. temperature in Vital Signa starting from 1950. Surprisingly, from 1998 they decreased the temperature for every prior year by exactly 1 degree.
Yes I’ve seen many references to this as well as other “corrections” made to the “official” record, such as completely erasing the medieval warming period so as to make the most recent warming period (from roughly 1980-2000ish) look unprecedented and alarming. It was neither of those things, it was merely part of the natural, cyclical pattern of warming and cooling periods that have always existed on earth. (Just prior to this latest warming period, for example, the fear mongering was all about a “cooling” climate and imminent “little ice age”. Hard to believe, but there were alarming, attention-grabbing newspaper articles making this prediction as recently as the 60s and 70s).
Warming periods are always followed by cooling periods and vice versa...it’s a balancing act that the earth has down pat and has always managed without any help from us. By many accounts, we actually ended the most recent warming period several years ago (anywhere from late 90s to late 2000s...?) and have been consistently cooling ever since. For excellent tracking of the record breaking cold temps/snow/ice events that you will never hear about from the heat seeking MSM, I recommend electroverse.co. He has an impressive archive - excellent articles going back years. I also highly recommend John Casey’s “Dark Winter” which was published in 2014. It’s a fascinating topic!