52 Comments

Ironically I just wrote about WA doing this today, with links inside the article:

https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/weekend-news

Let me know if you need more links, I might be able to dig some up. I also have tons of screenshots showing the changes, some of which aren't in articles!

Expand full comment
author

I read all your stuff, but missed this. Thanks!

Expand full comment

It's only an hour or so old :)

The most damning things (IMO) are the moving of the goalposts from total beds to staffed adult beds, Snohomish hiding the data once it got bad, and then the drop in capacity that follows the mandate.

Expand full comment

BUT THE HOSPITALS WILL BE OVERWHELMED! THERE WILL BE SICK PEOPLE DYING ON THE STREETS! (sarcastic yelling).

Expand full comment

My favorite panic articles were about how Idaho had run out of ICU beds and were shipping patients to Washington. When you actually looked into it, it was Northern Idaho (the long skinny part) which routinely sends people to WA hospitals because they're closer than ID hospitals.

A close second were the breathless articles exclaiming that FOUR WA COUNTIES WERE COMPLETELY OUT OF ICU BEDS! "Regular" ICU capacity of those four counties: 0.

Expand full comment

Doctor Drew, who even now still thinks Fauci will be vindicated in the end, said that the panic over hospital overwhelm was ridiculous. He cited that often the first hospitals to reach capacity were county hospitals for the uninsured., and that usually what was meant by "overwhelm" referred to "staffed icu beds" rather than "bed capacity. Meaning there were always plenty of beds, but that they were running low on staff.

Finally, he also talked about that for any hospital to be a viable business and make money, it had to have at least 80% capacity at all times.

I think I looked over the Johns Hopkins graphs that showed "covid capacity" and very often Covid cases were far lower than the other reasons for hospitalization.

Expand full comment

WA, BC, AB.... they're all doing it. When the facts do not support the narrative, you simply stop reporting them cause you know, they're #misinformation.

Expand full comment

Public Health Scotland.

Their data was some of the earliest and the best, breaking out 'cases', hospitalisations, ICU and covid deaths by vaccination status. They of course included the classic data ruining trick of classifying people within 14-21 days of being jabbed as 'unjabbed', but the data was good. Then was suddenly pulled as it was 'being mis-used by anti-vaxxers'. In reality the numbers were horribly going against the narrative.

Expand full comment

might be worth an FoI request though: they still collect the data.

Expand full comment
Jan 7, 2023Liked by T Coddington

The CDC stopped reporting “breakthrough cases” (remember breakthrough cases?) in May 2021. https://www.newsweek.com/why-did-cdc-stop-counting-mild-asymptomatic-breakthrough-covid-cases-1616802

Expand full comment

I wondered how long until that happened. When governments stop publishing data, and, even worse, stop collecting the data, force people to submit FOI request to see the data, or worse, refuse FOI requests, it is because they have something to hide. I wonder for how long until the FOI system will be removed?

Expand full comment
Jan 7, 2023·edited Jan 7, 2023Liked by T Coddington

Yes, the cover up has been well under way in Scotland in realtion to cardiac chest pain case data.

See below: From July 2021 immediately the time under 40's got the jab all data now erased. Bad luck for them i kept the original data and can see why they scrubbed it !

See Scots ambulance service cardiovascular OUT OF HOURS. Orwell would approve.

https://scotland.shinyapps.io/phs-covid-wider-impact/

Expand full comment
Jan 7, 2023·edited Jan 7, 2023Liked by T Coddington

Mysteriously, Week 6 has “appeared” out of the blue.

https://krap.substack.com/p/about-kakistan-and-krap

Probably just an oversight not publishing it in their website for about a year.

https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/Documents/covid-19-surveillance-report-20210213.pdf

Edit: Should have said week 7.

https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/Documents/covid-19-surveillance-report-20210220.pdf

Edit 2: My bad, need to wear my glasses or get a bigger phone, just went to my computer to download before it went missing again and check the meta data and found I'd gotten the years wrong.

WEEK 7-2022 IS STILL MISSING.

Expand full comment
Jan 7, 2023Liked by T Coddington

Ontario, Canada stopped reporting based on vaxx stats a while ago as it didn’t suit the agenda

Expand full comment
Jan 7, 2023Liked by T Coddington

The numbers were looking really grim last spring. So in Ontario (and Alberta, if memory serves me) they did likewise (likely other provinces across Canada too). Here is link to Ontario's justification.

https://data2.ontario.ca/en/dataset/covid-19-vaccine-data-in-ontario/resource/274b819c-5d69-4539-a4db-f2950794138c

Expand full comment

Wonderful work, and I am grateful to Joel Smalley for sharing it and bringing it to my mailbox! Now I know about your work, which is great. :)

Quick technical question. Or rather, two technical questions. The first table lists 6 deaths under "no dose." So then, it's not zero deaths, or am I missing something? Also, how do they calculate deaths outside of hospitals (since hospitalizations are zero)?

Expand full comment
author

I have updated the post & wrote a Mea Culpa post on the 6... truly an oversight on my part. On the 2nd question, I haven't a clue ;)

Expand full comment

Thank you, oh I see the update now, and the new post. And it happens, I've made mistakes, too (and corrected them), it's how intellectual integrity works!!

Expand full comment

I cross-posted your story. Hopefully more people will see it!!

Expand full comment
Jan 7, 2023Liked by T Coddington

You say 'it is a bit crazy that we have a row of 0’s for the “No Dose” row.'

We don't, we have a row of "0, 0, 6". I think this write-up needs correcting, it's misleading.

Expand full comment
author

My bad. Wrote a new mea culpa post.

Expand full comment

Cheers! As soon as posted I was thinking "Mmmm maybe I'm misinterpreting" ha.

The point of your writeup still stands of course - we have evidence from many many countries that shows the same pattern of risk increasing with each dose.

Expand full comment
Jan 7, 2023Liked by T Coddington

Wasn’t it Igor who first brought this information out?

Expand full comment

They want to be able to blame it on the boosters. Hence the wording of the rationale used.

The signal that they have been trying to ignore, is too loud. So if they stop reporting by vaccination status, now that the "safe and effectiveness" has been established ( that's why "trend" was used😐🤔🙄. So then the massive jump in all cause mortality figures for 2022 can be skewed to finger the "boosters". Despite the fact the booster is the exact same shot. Which they will gloss over. The boosters will be to blame, but that's ok because we have the developer's making "new generation" mRNA "vaccines".😐😑🤦‍♀️🤦‍♀️

We have to establish evidence of the damage done prior to boosters and seperate it from the boosters data, so we can counter their coming quasi-medico BS.

Expand full comment

When all the sheep get vaccinated, the only ones dying are the sheep. One at a time, right over the cliff.

Expand full comment

It’s starting to get hot, isn’t it? The flames of hell may be starting to nick the posteriors of the architects, the enforcers & the otherwise complicit.

Expand full comment