I happened to catch someone on Twitter today who highlighted the fact that in the most recent report from New South Wales Australia, all of the recent hospitalizations, ICU patients, and deaths had been vaccinated: Source: https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/Documents/weekly-covid-overview-20221231.pdf
Let me know if you need more links, I might be able to dig some up. I also have tons of screenshots showing the changes, some of which aren't in articles!
Their data was some of the earliest and the best, breaking out 'cases', hospitalisations, ICU and covid deaths by vaccination status. They of course included the classic data ruining trick of classifying people within 14-21 days of being jabbed as 'unjabbed', but the data was good. Then was suddenly pulled as it was 'being mis-used by anti-vaxxers'. In reality the numbers were horribly going against the narrative.
I wondered how long until that happened. When governments stop publishing data, and, even worse, stop collecting the data, force people to submit FOI request to see the data, or worse, refuse FOI requests, it is because they have something to hide. I wonder for how long until the FOI system will be removed?
Jan 7, 2023·edited Jan 7, 2023Liked by T Coddington
Yes, the cover up has been well under way in Scotland in realtion to cardiac chest pain case data.
See below: From July 2021 immediately the time under 40's got the jab all data now erased. Bad luck for them i kept the original data and can see why they scrubbed it !
See Scots ambulance service cardiovascular OUT OF HOURS. Orwell would approve.
Edit 2: My bad, need to wear my glasses or get a bigger phone, just went to my computer to download before it went missing again and check the meta data and found I'd gotten the years wrong.
The numbers were looking really grim last spring. So in Ontario (and Alberta, if memory serves me) they did likewise (likely other provinces across Canada too). Here is link to Ontario's justification.
Wonderful work, and I am grateful to Joel Smalley for sharing it and bringing it to my mailbox! Now I know about your work, which is great. :)
Quick technical question. Or rather, two technical questions. The first table lists 6 deaths under "no dose." So then, it's not zero deaths, or am I missing something? Also, how do they calculate deaths outside of hospitals (since hospitalizations are zero)?
They want to be able to blame it on the boosters. Hence the wording of the rationale used.
The signal that they have been trying to ignore, is too loud. So if they stop reporting by vaccination status, now that the "safe and effectiveness" has been established ( that's why "trend" was used😐🤔🙄. So then the massive jump in all cause mortality figures for 2022 can be skewed to finger the "boosters". Despite the fact the booster is the exact same shot. Which they will gloss over. The boosters will be to blame, but that's ok because we have the developer's making "new generation" mRNA "vaccines".😐😑🤦♀️🤦♀️
We have to establish evidence of the damage done prior to boosters and seperate it from the boosters data, so we can counter their coming quasi-medico BS.
It’s starting to get hot, isn’t it? The flames of hell may be starting to nick the posteriors of the architects, the enforcers & the otherwise complicit.
Ironically I just wrote about WA doing this today, with links inside the article:
https://simulationcommander.substack.com/p/weekend-news
Let me know if you need more links, I might be able to dig some up. I also have tons of screenshots showing the changes, some of which aren't in articles!
Public Health Scotland.
Their data was some of the earliest and the best, breaking out 'cases', hospitalisations, ICU and covid deaths by vaccination status. They of course included the classic data ruining trick of classifying people within 14-21 days of being jabbed as 'unjabbed', but the data was good. Then was suddenly pulled as it was 'being mis-used by anti-vaxxers'. In reality the numbers were horribly going against the narrative.
The CDC stopped reporting “breakthrough cases” (remember breakthrough cases?) in May 2021. https://www.newsweek.com/why-did-cdc-stop-counting-mild-asymptomatic-breakthrough-covid-cases-1616802
I wondered how long until that happened. When governments stop publishing data, and, even worse, stop collecting the data, force people to submit FOI request to see the data, or worse, refuse FOI requests, it is because they have something to hide. I wonder for how long until the FOI system will be removed?
Alberta is the most notorious! https://metatron.substack.com/p/alberta-just-inadvertently-confessed
Yes, the cover up has been well under way in Scotland in realtion to cardiac chest pain case data.
See below: From July 2021 immediately the time under 40's got the jab all data now erased. Bad luck for them i kept the original data and can see why they scrubbed it !
See Scots ambulance service cardiovascular OUT OF HOURS. Orwell would approve.
https://scotland.shinyapps.io/phs-covid-wider-impact/
Mysteriously, Week 6 has “appeared” out of the blue.
https://krap.substack.com/p/about-kakistan-and-krap
Probably just an oversight not publishing it in their website for about a year.
https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/Documents/covid-19-surveillance-report-20210213.pdf
Edit: Should have said week 7.
https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/Documents/covid-19-surveillance-report-20210220.pdf
Edit 2: My bad, need to wear my glasses or get a bigger phone, just went to my computer to download before it went missing again and check the meta data and found I'd gotten the years wrong.
WEEK 7-2022 IS STILL MISSING.
Ontario, Canada stopped reporting based on vaxx stats a while ago as it didn’t suit the agenda
https://web.elastic.org/~fche/blog4/posts/hiding_inconvenient_truths/ Ontario, Canada
The numbers were looking really grim last spring. So in Ontario (and Alberta, if memory serves me) they did likewise (likely other provinces across Canada too). Here is link to Ontario's justification.
https://data2.ontario.ca/en/dataset/covid-19-vaccine-data-in-ontario/resource/274b819c-5d69-4539-a4db-f2950794138c
Wonderful work, and I am grateful to Joel Smalley for sharing it and bringing it to my mailbox! Now I know about your work, which is great. :)
Quick technical question. Or rather, two technical questions. The first table lists 6 deaths under "no dose." So then, it's not zero deaths, or am I missing something? Also, how do they calculate deaths outside of hospitals (since hospitalizations are zero)?
You say 'it is a bit crazy that we have a row of 0’s for the “No Dose” row.'
We don't, we have a row of "0, 0, 6". I think this write-up needs correcting, it's misleading.
Wasn’t it Igor who first brought this information out?
They want to be able to blame it on the boosters. Hence the wording of the rationale used.
The signal that they have been trying to ignore, is too loud. So if they stop reporting by vaccination status, now that the "safe and effectiveness" has been established ( that's why "trend" was used😐🤔🙄. So then the massive jump in all cause mortality figures for 2022 can be skewed to finger the "boosters". Despite the fact the booster is the exact same shot. Which they will gloss over. The boosters will be to blame, but that's ok because we have the developer's making "new generation" mRNA "vaccines".😐😑🤦♀️🤦♀️
We have to establish evidence of the damage done prior to boosters and seperate it from the boosters data, so we can counter their coming quasi-medico BS.
When all the sheep get vaccinated, the only ones dying are the sheep. One at a time, right over the cliff.
It’s starting to get hot, isn’t it? The flames of hell may be starting to nick the posteriors of the architects, the enforcers & the otherwise complicit.