COVID Data: Here today, gone tomorrow

I happened to catch someone on Twitter today who highlighted the fact that in the most recent report from New South Wales Australia, all of the recent hospitalizations, ICU patients, and deaths had been vaccinated:

Source: https://www.health.nsw.gov.au/Infectious/covid-19/Documents/weekly-covid-overview-20221231.pdf

While NSW is a very heavily vaccinated area, and by now it would be of no surprise that the majority of COVID patients and deaths to be among the vaccinated, it is a bit crazy that we have a row of 0’s for the “No Dose” row (Ooops- correction, not a row of 0’s. Zero hospitalizations. zero ICU patients, 6 deaths. Curious, to say the least, but forgive my oversight in original sentence). Not to worry, the NSW health authorities have a solution, namely (from the same document):

This reminded me of when the UKHSA stopped showing cases, hospitalizations, and deaths by vaccine status back in April of 2022:

Source: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/1066759/Vaccine-surveillance-report-week-13.pdf

I’m sure there are hundreds of other examples where the health authorities stopped publishing data that was inconvenient. I will look for more, but would love to crowd source this, so please contribute in the comments if you have other examples. Would be great to get a large compilations for posterity.

Addendum

For further context on the UKHSA stopping their reporting. Here is the last set of rates they reported. As you can see, they could not hide that the triple-dosed were getting COVID at far higher rates than the unvaccinated. The emergency room visits were roughly equal, while the deaths seemed to still favor the triple-dosed (of course, even this is almost certainly misleading in favor of the vaccines because of the fact that they don’t count you as triple-dosed until 14 days after the last shot. Notice they don’t report on the double-dosed below…. that’s because the numbers would look very bad.)