I don't have any evidence of that... one would certainly hope they are using the aggregate number of women who have any number of doses. The problem for me is when I try to determine when women were vaccinated, it becomes unclear because they now are reporting each instance of a dose as a "vaccination" of that woman. Hope this is clear.
Are you saying that there may be known significant double counting in the denominator of the vaccinated bar in the UKHSA Vaccine efficacy reports?
That’s fraud if true.
I don't have any evidence of that... one would certainly hope they are using the aggregate number of women who have any number of doses. The problem for me is when I try to determine when women were vaccinated, it becomes unclear because they now are reporting each instance of a dose as a "vaccination" of that woman. Hope this is clear.
I rule nothing out tbh...
As someone who works in UK civil service I can assure you it's far more likely to be incompetence. Particularly in that agency.
Obviously referring to the stillbirth etc section, not the general part.
Keep going!
I wonder if the obfuscation is because they're stupid or trying to be devious.