From the archives.... a (relatively) early call on the BS vaccine efficacy claims
Reading the latest from El Gato & watching the video therein reminded me of one of my earliest posts. Since I have gained quite a number of readers since then & it’s fun to look back on what should have been obvious to anyone analyzing the data, I share with you my post from October 2021:
The 95% efficacy claim was one of the things that made me delve further into the vaccine data. It smelt like BS but I had people all around me singing and dancing that we were saved. It smelt like BS and a quick look at the data made me realise it was BS. Try telling that to the ones singing and dancing though and the joy quickly turned to anger (and this was mainly from doctors!). I was genuinely shocked how angry people got when the 95% efficacy claim was questioned!
At the risk of repeating myself on every 'Stack in existence today, we have to remind ourselves that the vaccine was ALWAYS going to be '100% effective' at the start because only the people who get through the worry window without getting covid get the 'fully vaccinated' title.
If you get covid during the 'worry window', you're counted as an unvaxxed case, but the shots you got still add to the 'vaccine coverage' total! It's complete datacrime!