Igor’s recent post asks us to look into whether any of the vaccine advocates is a plagiarist… And after roughly 2 minutes of research, I think I have a major scoop. Dr. Anthony Fauci, the country’s leading expert on infectious disease (as I believe we are required to say by law when HIS name is mentioned, praise be to Fauci) is unfortunately a plagiarist.
Fauci is a freaking puppet/fall guy. He likely made a deal where by he gets to exit "science" and the public arena, with his reputation and retirement package in tact, in exchange for being the "face of science" during covid, to allow the WEFs play re digital society, AND he would be protected from the fallout of the Aids/HIV fiasco he initiated( see Celia Farber and co work if your curious), AND the SV40 simian contamination that was initially Salk and
And co's problem, but Fauci covered it up when it was going to come out later on (See Judy Moskovits And Ken Heckenlively's book Plague, likewise curious cats).
Fauci has so many freaking bodies and skeletons going on, it's no surprise if it comes out that Epstein had blackmail worthy dirt on him. And frankly Epstein was all go on the genetically modified populations agenda😉🤔😐🤐
So Fauci is sailing down the fall out river. Most likely he will ultimately meet an awkward end, but hey! The dudes 80years or so he'll live well in the meantime 😉🤷♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️😤
In the sciences, "authors" are routinely on papers that they don't write. There are almost always several names, the first name is usually (but not always) the person who wrote the paper, and the several other names could be 1) the head of the lab who funded, 2) people who were consulted, 3) younger colleagues to give them some exposure 4) someone the real author wants a favor from later and so on. Wherever you are in the list, it counts a "publication." Long story short, senior and powerful scientists can get a lot of publications legitimately (as things are done) without a great deal of work. You need to be careful about your inferences.
They got Al Capone on tax evasion. So I can see your point. But where exactly does it say that NIH employees cannot plagarize? I suppose the publications themselves would have to initiate the violations on the part of Fauci to get him in any 'trouble'. I am hoping he falls in a hole, deep hole.
Fauci is a freaking puppet/fall guy. He likely made a deal where by he gets to exit "science" and the public arena, with his reputation and retirement package in tact, in exchange for being the "face of science" during covid, to allow the WEFs play re digital society, AND he would be protected from the fallout of the Aids/HIV fiasco he initiated( see Celia Farber and co work if your curious), AND the SV40 simian contamination that was initially Salk and
And co's problem, but Fauci covered it up when it was going to come out later on (See Judy Moskovits And Ken Heckenlively's book Plague, likewise curious cats).
Fauci has so many freaking bodies and skeletons going on, it's no surprise if it comes out that Epstein had blackmail worthy dirt on him. And frankly Epstein was all go on the genetically modified populations agenda😉🤔😐🤐
So Fauci is sailing down the fall out river. Most likely he will ultimately meet an awkward end, but hey! The dudes 80years or so he'll live well in the meantime 😉🤷♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️🤦♀️😤
In the sciences, "authors" are routinely on papers that they don't write. There are almost always several names, the first name is usually (but not always) the person who wrote the paper, and the several other names could be 1) the head of the lab who funded, 2) people who were consulted, 3) younger colleagues to give them some exposure 4) someone the real author wants a favor from later and so on. Wherever you are in the list, it counts a "publication." Long story short, senior and powerful scientists can get a lot of publications legitimately (as things are done) without a great deal of work. You need to be careful about your inferences.
They got Al Capone on tax evasion. So I can see your point. But where exactly does it say that NIH employees cannot plagarize? I suppose the publications themselves would have to initiate the violations on the part of Fauci to get him in any 'trouble'. I am hoping he falls in a hole, deep hole.