Ugh. Despite living on the other side of the Atlantic, much of my analysis has been focused on the data in the UK because the availability and quality was much better than the data in the US. Or at least is appeared to be. As I’ve been doing some additional analysis of the Surveillance reports and the pregnancy data in particular, I am seeing some things that make me concerned about the reliability of the published data. Since I have many data-savvy readers, please check me on my calculation and logic.
Sums that don’t match
In the 2022 Week 8 report, we see the following:
4,780 women 1st dose prior to pregnancy
8,353 vaccinated in 1st trimester
28,468 vaccinated in 2nd trimester
39,138 in 3rd trimester
22,887 known vaccinated, unknown trimester
The total of those numbers, which should cover all women receiving at least one dose of vaccine prior to giving birth is 103,626 which is significantly higher than the value of 78,759 which is the number given in the 1st sentence of the paragraph. The same problem presents in the report when data is next updated, Week 12.
Implausible implied data
The 1st update of the pregnancy data occured between the 2022 Week 3 report to the 2022 Week 4 report.
Week 3 tells us:
Week 4 updates:
This says that Jan-Aug had a stillbirth rate of 3.60 per 1,000 & Jan-Oct had a rate of 3.90 per 1,000 for vaccinated women. This jumped out to me as a big increase in the aggregate rate based simply on adding two months to the data set. Sept & Oct must have been really bad in order for the year to data to increase that much in such a short period of time. How bad? Well, we can calculate by using the monthly numbers on births & vaccination status, plus some logic and arithmetic. The other piece of data we need is the following:
So, now we can calculate the following:
Jan-Aug
324,749 unvaccinated women gave birth
Using a rate of 3.60 stillbirths/1,000 → 1,169 stillbirths
Jan-Oct
382,591 unvaccinated women gave birth
Using a rate of 3.90 stillbirths/1,000 → 1,492 stillbirths
Sep-Oct
57,842 unvaccinated women gave birth
Stillbirths: 1,492 (Jan-Oct) - 1,169 (Jan-Aug)= 323 stillbirths
→ 1000 x (323/57,842) = 5.58 stillbirths per 1K
This would be a deeply concerning number if true. We are left with two possibilities.
A mistake was made in the reports and the numbers are wrong (I suspect this is the case, and the stillbirth rate Jan-Aug is reported too low)
Something really scary happened to unvaccinated women in Sept-Oct in their pregnancies. If the data is accurate, this should be investigated immediately.
Again, peer review is encouraged.
Update: UKHSA responds to 1st question
Is it anything to do with the fact that the UK govt considers you to be unjabbed for between 14 and 28 days after the jab? I've seen this referred to a lot by JohnDee's Almanac. It varies by health trust as well apparently. I don't know if you've factored this in.
For "Sums that don’t match" I believe the paragraph is combining two distinct categories. The first sentence is figures for "women who gave birth;" everything after is for "went on to conceive or deliver," in other words includes still-ongoing pregnancies.